A.M. Mwafy, A.S. Elnashai
Part I: Implications of Design Assumptions on Capacity Estimates
and Limit States of Multi-Span Curved Bridges
Summary 3
Introduction . 4
Structural and Geotechnical Characteristics . 5
Structural and Foundation Modeling . 7
Limit States and Analysis Procedure . .11
Dynamic Characteristics and Model Verification . .14
Capacity Estimates and Prioritizing Limit State . .17
Conclusions . .22
Acknowledgment . .24
References . .25
Part II: Comparative Assessment of the Designed and As-Built Simulations
of Complex Bridges Subjected to Increasing Earthquake Intensities
Summary . . 3
Introduction . . 4
Ingredients of the Assessment Study . . 5
Selection of the Dynamic Analysis Parameters . . 8
Demand Predictions at the Design Earthquake . .10
Demand Predictions at Twice the Design Earthquake . .19
Conclusions . .22
Acknowledgments . .24
References . .25
View Report
and Limit States of Multi-Span Curved Bridges
Summary 3
Introduction . 4
Structural and Geotechnical Characteristics . 5
Structural and Foundation Modeling . 7
Limit States and Analysis Procedure . .11
Dynamic Characteristics and Model Verification . .14
Capacity Estimates and Prioritizing Limit State . .17
Conclusions . .22
Acknowledgment . .24
References . .25
Part II: Comparative Assessment of the Designed and As-Built Simulations
of Complex Bridges Subjected to Increasing Earthquake Intensities
Summary . . 3
Introduction . . 4
Ingredients of the Assessment Study . . 5
Selection of the Dynamic Analysis Parameters . . 8
Demand Predictions at the Design Earthquake . .10
Demand Predictions at Twice the Design Earthquake . .19
Conclusions . .22
Acknowledgments . .24
References . .25
View Report